The story is particularly apt coming at the anniversary
of Occupy Wall Street and in the midst of the presidential campaign.
To make matters worse, Richard falls asleep at the wheel
while driving to the country at night with his mistress.
He crashes her car and it explodes with her in it after he escapes the wreckage.
Instead of reporting the accident, he has a young black man (Nate Parker), whose family he has been helping, pick him up and drive him home.
Besieged by a wily detective (Tim Roth) and the internal accounting
investigation of his daughter/colleague (the exquisite Britt Marling whose own
film Another
Earth is a must see and is currently available on HBO), Miller tries
every means possible to survive.
Well-paced and well-acted, the issue with Arbitrage
is this: are we for this
Wall Street magnate or not? Do we want
him to win because he claims he does what he does for his family, workers and
investors or do we want to be caught because he has betrayed his wife and his daughter’s principles, avoided confessing
to his crimes and cheated his merger partner?
What does our answer say about us?
Director Nicholas Jarecki handles this story well. The only thing I think he missed was one shot
in the mirror of the Miller bedroom, when his wife gives him her ultimatum. Has he learned that he who yells loudest is not necessarily
the winner or has this odyssey taught him nothing?
In parallel to Arbitrage is the story of another
guy who thinks yelling loud makes one The Master.
Let me start by saying this film is brilliantly photographed by Mihai Malaimare, Jr backed up by a fabulous lighting crew, including Thomas M. Dangcil, Mike Gerzevitz, Frank Helbig and Michael Lyon. The close-ups, the long shots…all exquisite.
Writer/Director Paul Thomas Anderson, backed by editors
Leslie Jones and Peter McNulty, has for some “Weird” reason chosen to pick
scenes that start, but don’t end. There’s a jump to some other scene without
conclusion to the one we're watching. And many of these scenes are
uninteresting or as if they're from some book I should have read in order to
understand why they are there.
So “What” is this all about? The buzz is that this is a takeoff on
Scientology and L. Ron Hubbard, but apparently Anderson did not have that in
mind when he initially wrote the script.
Nevertheless, it’s a great marketing ploy that’s made for sold-out shows
all weekend in Manhattan and may keep the film going. The bad news
is that there’s no lack of cult leaders to form the basis of stories like this one.
When I asked the stranger seated next to me what she
thought of the film, she, too, mentioned the cinematography and the great
acting, but as far as the story, she was speechless. She’d have to think about it. Don’t waste your time, dear. Take in something more intelligent like a 3 Stooges
episode. This is not an important work and anyone who thinks it is is fodder for a cult.
For its actors and tech people, I give it a 3 out of 5. If you're going to go, I recommend seeing it in 70mm projection to enjoy the richness of the images.
No comments:
Post a Comment